If you don't think your leader needs to be here in person Martin, it's you who doesn't understand m8.skinnymartin wrote:If you think video conferencing is Skype you don't understand it.
Curfews punish the innocent - not a fan. Would also tie up police time and effort.
The police need to be told to get in there and run snatch squads. A Black Maria 100m behind a police line, and the police charge and snatch, lock the tw*t in the black maria, charge again, flailing batons and grabbing protestors. If that had happened on night one it would not have spread. I watched a scene on Sky news with a protestor stood about 2 yards in front of 4 officers, taunting them. All they did was swing batons in a way that ensured they got nowhere near the guy. Would love a YouTube video of that btw.
I am afraid I am massively critical of the police response. I am all for the Army being called in - but it will have huge long term implications for the Met - it will be a statement of total failure and could not happen without a total rebuild of the Met following it. It is something that needs to happen - but the politics of that sort of action is huge.
Wouldn't surprise me if the Army option was suddenly deployed tonight with no notice (if it kicks off again - which I hope it won't).
I am also a bit disappointed with Cameron's response today. But I am more concerned with what he has said behind the scenes. I hope he tore the Acting Commander of the Met a new arsehole - but he couldn't do that publicly because of the impact on the guys on the ground.
When you keep closing down youth clubs and give kids nothing to do, and no future to look forward to, this is the end result. This isn't the end of it, by a long way.